New rail link moves step closer after achieving government support
Posted: 10 September 2019 | Global Railway Review | 3 comments
Communities between Oxford and Cambridge in Britain are on track to be linked by rail before the end of the next decade, creating opportunities for employment and business growth across the region.
Businesses between Bedford and Cambridge have welcomed the news that Government have declared their section of the East West Rail Project a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP). This means that following comprehensive public consultation involving local authorities across the route, the East West Railway Company (EWR Co) can apply to the Secretary of State for Transport for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to authorise the project.
East West Rail is creating a new direct connection between Oxford and Cambridge, and beyond. Serving communities across the area, it will bring faster journey times and lower transport costs as well as easing pressure on local roads.
As a double-helping of support, the scheme was also mentioned in the 2019 Autumn Spending Review when Chancellor Sajid Javid set out the Government’s spending plans for 2020-2021. The Treasury report references its continued support for the development of major transport projects including: “driving forward East West Rail links in the Oxford to Cambridge Arc”.
Richard Tunnicliffe, East of England Regional Director, CBI said: “Local business wants to see greater connectivity across the region, widening access to skills, and new opportunities for collaboration. Delivering East West Rail is a positive step to help achieve this, and this welcome news confirms Government commitment to the Oxford to Cambridge Arc and gives us all a much clearer view of the process ahead.”
Rob Brighouse, Chairman at EWR Co, added: “I fully appreciate the importance of good connectivity to support local communities. So, achieving this status as an NSIP is important because it unlocks the ability for us to secure a Development Consent Order to authorise the project. It’s brilliant to get two affirmations for the project in one week with our mention in the Government Spending Review also warmly welcomed.”
Earlier in 2019, EWR Co consulted on five possible route options for the line between Bedford and Cambridge. A full report of the consultation is expected to be published later in 2019, alongside the preferred route.
NEW REPORT FROM GLOBAL RAILWAY REVIEW: Track Insight – Track Maintenance | Transforming Track Maintenance Through Technology
Our latest expert-led Track Insight explores how industry leaders are revolutionising the future of track maintenance through cutting-edge innovation and real-world strategies.
From automation and robotics now streamlining inspections and repairs, to predictive maintenance powered by IoT sensors and advanced analytics, the rail sector is entering a new era of precision and efficiency. Companies like Goldschmidt, Bentley Systems, and MxV Rail are leading the charge, redefining how infrastructure is managed with AI, machine learning, and digital twins to reduce downtime and extend asset life.
In this new data-rich landscape, organisations such as Amtrak and the Rail Accident Investigation Branch are demonstrating how to turn vast streams of information—from track geometry to environmental monitoring into actionable intelligence for safer, smarter networks.
Download this insightful, practical guide for FREE and see how your operations can evolve – READ FOR FREE NOW!
So, on the basis of future probability. We are looking at a greater conurbation between Sandy & Biggleswade, or between Sandy & St. Neots. (My thoughts:- Greater unification between Sandy & Biggleswade. St. Neots will be left out of a direct North-South / East-West link.) We will have to travel a short distance to connect to those East-West services. How will the busses / other road transport cope with increasing volume??
I am not sure that this route is a good idea. There is a good bus service that links Oxford and Cambridge and I think it may duplicate existing provision. I know many people prefer trains to buses which they find rather claustrophobic (myself included). This could be an argument used to extend services. The only problem is this is a very densely populated part of the world with a lot of traffic and countryside and recreational space is at a bit of a premium. I think the route would provide a lot of upheavel. I think you need to consult with organisations like “Campaign to Protect Rural England” to take their fears into account.
Where are you, Kathy?